War on crime adversely affects war on terrorism, professor says
The U.S. governments war on domestic crime and punishment
has left it poorly prepared to deal with the effects of the Sept.
11 terrorist attacks and the subsequent war on terrorism, according
to a former U-M professor.
|Simon (Photo by Paul Jaronski, U-M Photo Services)
Jonathan Simon, formerly an assistant professor of political science
at U-M, returned to campus Oct. 9 to deliver the lecture, The
Land of the Free and the Home of the Fearful: Governing America
Through Fear of Crime before 9/11 and Since, as part of the
International Institutes Comparative Study of Social Transformations
It is clear to me the great bulk of our system of security
is not even remotely interested in (the terrorists) or their plot,
said Simon, now a professor of law at the University of Miami. The
plotters who murdered 3,000 people were not born addicted to crack,
did not blow off school or do drugs. We should be carefully monitoring
the people arrested, punished and deported in this war on terrorism
to make sure the government is targeting people who act like terrorists
instead of look like them.
Meanwhile, Simon said, the country has a vast security system
ready to seize a 16-year-old with an open beer bottle.
We should be very concerned that we spend such a large portion
of our resources managing the 3 percent of the adult population
that is in the justice system, none of whom was involved in the
Sept. 11 attacks, he said. There seems to be no talk
about redirecting our resources to fight a war on terrorism.
Simon said the focus on crime and punishment since the terrorist
attacks has given rise to claims that, before Sept. 11, America
was a country with little fear of violence, and that since the attacks,
the federal government has launched an assault on the civil liberties
of citizens, residents and visitors to the United States.
Instead, he said, fear of crime in America, particularly armed
violence, has reshaped the collective lives of Americans and the
countrys institutions since the assassination of President
John F. Kennedy in 1963.
The fear of crime can have a more powerful effect on people
and neighborhoods than crime itself, said Simon. Fear
of crime governs us in our choices of where to live, where to work,
where to send our children to school. And those choices are made
with increasing reference to crime.
This fear of crime has caused Americans to engage in an unprecedented
buildup of mechanisms of punishment and social control, he said.
He cited statistics showing a rise in the number of Americans in
prison or jail from 110 for every 110,000 people before 1980 to
700 for every 100,000 people during the past 20 years.
Simon said the incarceration of two million Americans is an obvious
way to govern through crime. Other signs of the trend are the rise
of gated communities and the building of public schools with metal
detectors and security forces, he said.
That focus on domestic crime and governing through the fear of
crime, he said, will hurt America if it faces a very real war on
The war on crime has been a massive redirection of government
effort, and among the side effects is that we are no safer, and
a good deal less safe, in the face of terror, he said. We
are hampered in our ability to deploy human labor and the administrative
resources necessary to respond to a serious war on terrorism if
we are faced with one.