Warnings about false claims often backfire with older consumers
Telling people, especially older adults, that a consumer claim is false can make them mistakenly remember it as true, say two marketing professors.
This tendency to misremember false claims as truethe "illusion of truth" effectcould put the older generation at considerable risk for consumer fraud and advertising scams, they say.
A study featured in the March issue of the Journal of Consumer Research raises concerns that attempts to correct false and questionable claims about consumer products actually may lead to negative consequences for older adults.
Carolyn Yoon and Norbert Schwarz of the Stephen M. Ross School of Business, and colleagues from the University of Toronto and University of Illinois, found that the more often older adults were told a claim was false, the more likely they were to incorrectly remember it as true after several days had passedespecially when the warning pertained to a claim with which they already were familiar.
"Suppose an advertising campaign promises that taking a certain herbal supplement reduces people's arthritis pains," says Yoon, assistant professor of marketing. "When there is no evidence for such beneficial effects, a typical warning would tell consumers, 'It is not true that taking the supplement will reduce your arthritis pains.'"
But by repeating the claim in the warning, it actually may serve to reinforce the older consumer's impression that the product works.
"Unfortunately, this repetition has an unintended consequenceit makes the claim seem more familiar when consumers hear it again," Yoon says. "Once their memory for the details of the warning fades, all that may be left is an increased feeling of familiarity when consumers later see the misleading claim in an advertisement."
The researchers tested how age and time-delay interact with repetition to lead to a greater likelihood of misremembering false statements as true. They exposed 32 younger people, ages 18-25, and 32 older adults, ages 71-86, one time or three times to claims that were explicitly labeled either false or true.
After three days, older adults misremembered 28 percent of false statements as true when they were told only once that the statement was false. However, they misremembered 40 percent of the false statements as true when they were told three times that the statement was false.
In general, familiar statements are more likely to be accepted as true than unfamiliar ones, the researchers say. Hence, repeated warnings can backfirethe more often consumers are told that a product claim is false, the more likely they are later on to accept it as true, once the details of the warning are forgotten. This is particularly likely for older adults.
"Detailed memory for the warning fades more quickly for older adults than it does for younger adults," Yoon says. "Once the contextual details about the claim's validity are lost, the remaining feeling of familiarity fosters the acceptance of false claims as true, rendering older adults particularly susceptible to this bias."
In essence, it appears people become increasingly susceptible to the illusion of truth as they age because they experience declines in memory for the context or source of information, but not for familiarity with it, the researchers say.
This has important public policy implications for protecting elderly consumers, they say.
"Consumers' possible exposure to health claims and rumors whose truth they cannot initially assess is a grave concern," says Schwarz, professor of marketing and psychology. "Whenever possible, education campaigns should focus on what is true and avoid reiterating what is false. In addition, it may be useful to provide people, particularly older adults, with written materials or visual imagery to supplement or improve memory."