A high percentage of doctors are not following national guidelines that could help them treat patients better. They dont have enough information, time or readiness to changeor enough confidence in their ability to do everything the guidelines recommend, according to a new study.
When it comes to guidelines for preventive health advice, lack of confidence is the most likely reason physicians gave for not following recommendations. But better educational efforts could help reverse this tendency and ensure that patients get consistent and up-to-date care, say the authors of a report published in the Oct. 20 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.
The study reviewed the results of 120 physician surveys, contained in 76 scientific papers published over the last 30 years. In each, doctors reported the biggest barriersin the areas of knowledge, attitudes and behaviorthat keep them from following the medical guidelines for specific diseases. The study was conducted by Michael Cabana, a pediatrician and lecturer in pediatrics, and his former colleagues at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health.
All of the authors have been involved separately in the development of different practice guidelines, and pooled their resources to look at the problems facing the implementation of such guidelines in general.
Despite the fact that physicians have evidence-based guidelines at their disposal for dozens of conditions, theyre having similar problems across the board in implementing them in their own practice, Cabana says. If these guidelines are going to have an impact on the way patients are treated, we need to understand the barriers that exist and find ways to overcome them.
Increasingly over the past 10 years, a number of medical societies, government agencies and non-profit groups have gathered experts to examine the current state of knowledge about different diseases and to develop guidelines to prevent or treat them. At one point, the American Medical Association had catalogued more than 1,500 different practice guidelines.
The resulting consensus statements aim to help both physicians and patients make the best decisions about health care. And as medical science advances, these organizations revisit, revise and reissue their guidelines, so that physicians can keep current without having to read numerous research journals.
But, says Cabana, the mere existence of a guideline doesnt necessarily mean that all physicians will know of it, know enough about it, agree with it, be confident enoughor even allowed by hospitals and insurersto follow it.
We found common themes running through these studies, common barriers to guideline use, he says. For example, in 78 percent of studies that surveyed doctors about awareness of a particular guideline, more than 10 percent of doctors said they simply werent aware of it. An even larger number were not familiar enough with the guideline to follow its recommendations.
Individual doctors may not agree entirely with the guidelines issued by their own peers, leading them to choose a different course of treatment, Cabana adds. Some physicians see certain guidelines as being too oversimplified or cookbook, not practical, a threat to their autonomy, or not completely justified by scientific evidence.
In all, lack of agreement with a guideline led more than 10 percent of doctors in a majority of surveys to reject the guidelines advice. But, Cabana says, doctors are less likely to disagree when asked about a particular guideline than they are when asked about guidelines in general.
More significant than lack of agreement, the researchers found, is physicians belief that they cannot perform the actions set out by a guideline and, in some cases, an expectation that they wont get the desired outcome. The authors discovered that the majority of the surveys that reported these barriers were related to guidelines that involved preventive health education and counseling.
Its advice-giving, not prescriptions or procedures, that seems to trip up the most doctors, Cabana explains. He notes that even telling people to stop smoking appears to seem pointless to many physicians because they may not feel they can make a difference.
An interesting area that needs more research, he adds, is the barrier of inertiaphysicians not adopting new guidelines because theyre stuck in their old way of doing things or have no motivation to change. Though few of the surveys analyzed by Cabana and his colleagues looked at this factor, all of those that did reported it was a problem for more than 20 percent of doctors surveyed. Correspondingly, the authors say, guidelines that tell doctors to stop an old, outdated practice might be harder for them to obey than guidelines that suggest adding a new one.
Finally, the report looked at external barriersfactors outside physicians control that might keep them from following a guideline. Patients themselves present a major hurdle; the fact that patient preferences may not match national recommendations was cited by more than 10 percent of doctors in all the surveys that looked at this factor.
Also seen as problems were the lack of a reminder system and of counseling materials, insufficient staff, poor reimbursement or increased costs for a different procedure, and increased liability. A simple lack of time figured strongly in many cases.
Cabana stresses that this study should not be a basis for new guidelines, but should make guideline developers more sensitive to the barriers that physicians face.
The study, he adds, should also influence the way guideline-adherence surveys are conducted. More surveys should ask doctors about the importance of several or many different barriers, rather than just one.
Medical educators who train doctors should also recognize the study and the lack of confidence many current physicians reported.
The practice administrators, Cabana adds, who are working in large health care organizations, making nursing staff and reimbursement decisions, and scheduling physician time, have an important role in overcoming these barriers, too.